Log In

Question about Construction of Morality

Philosophy

Originais Teachy

Construction of Morality

Medium

(Originais Teachy 2024) - Question Medium of Philosophy

In the scope of human relations, the construction of morality has been the subject of study and reflection in various areas of knowledge, from Philosophy to Sociology, passing through Psychology. In this context, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant proposed a categorical imperative that, synthetically, determines: 'Act in such a way that the maxim of your action can always be valid as a principle of universal legislation'. Considering this Kantian premise and reflecting on contemporary ethical complexities, such as dilemmas related to privacy and the increasing social interactions mediated by technologies, what would be the application of Kant's categorical imperative for evaluating behavior on digital platforms?
a.
According to the categorical imperative, sharing third-party personal information without consent is an action that promotes collective well-being and, therefore, is morally obligatory.
b.
The categorical imperative of Kant justifies sharing personal information on digital platforms, as it contributes to transparency and open communication in society.
c.
Kant's categorical imperative leads us to reject sharing third-party personal information without consent as a morally inappropriate practice on digital platforms.
d.
According to Kant, sharing personal information without consent is a morally neutral action, as it cannot be universalized as a law applicable to all rational beings.
e.
Kant would argue that sharing personal information without consent is a moral duty, promoting social integration and efficiency in relationships mediated by technologies.

Answer sheet:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Curabitur id consequat justo. Cras pellentesque urna ante, eget gravida quam pretium ut. Praesent aliquam nibh faucibus ligula placerat, eget pulvinar velit gravida. Nam sollicitudin pretium elit a feugiat. Vestibulum pharetra, sem quis tempor volutpat, magna diam tincidunt enim, in ullamcorper tellus nibh vitae turpis. In egestas convallis ultrices.
Emoji eyes

Answer sheet

You need to be a registered teacher to view the answer sheet

Emoji eyes
Iara Tip

IARA TIP

Are you putting together a test or exercise list?

On Teachy’s platform, you can automatically generate these materials without spending hours searching for questions 😉

Those who viewed this question also liked...
Question icon

Question

Difficulty Medium

Source:

Is external icon

UNIEVANGÉLICA

Politics and Power

Question icon

Question

Difficulty Medium

Source:

Is external icon

Teachy

The interaction between science and society is a complex theme that involves ethical issues, intellectual freedom, cultural diversity, and religious beliefs. In 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,' Thomas Kuhn argues that scientific revolutions are not simple accumulations of new discoveries, but rather 'paradigm shifts' that reconfigure the way we see and understand the world. These changes sometimes conflict with established values and traditions. Considering the context of this statement, and looking at the evolution of genetics and biotechnology, Oliver D. Crisp in 'Genetics, Culture, and Ethics' highlights that 'scientific advances often force society to reevaluate its ethical and moral norms, as well as its religious premises.' Based on this quote, discuss how the evolution of scientific thought in the field of genetics and biotechnology challenges preexisting cultural and religious values. In light of Kuhn's concept of 'paradigm shift,' analyze to what extent the acceptance of new scientific advances in these areas can be seen as a matter of intellectual freedom or as the imposition of a new set of beliefs on society.

Science and its Contexts: Ethics, Freedom, Culture, and Religion

Question icon

Question

Difficulty Hard

Source:

Is external icon

Teachy

In contemporary times, the notion of ethics transcends the individual sphere and approaches social and global dynamics, influencing decisions in various areas such as politics, economy, and technology. In this context, the philosopher Hannah Arendt discusses the 'banality of evil', referring to how the lack of critical reflection and the uncritical following of orders can lead to devastating ethical consequences. In her work 'Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil', Arendt analyzes the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the main organizers of the Holocaust, and argues that he was not a sadist or an individual with malevolent intentions, but rather someone who meticulously followed orders without questioning the moral consequences of his actions. Given the above, and considering Arendt's thinking, what is the relevance of critical thinking in the context of ethical decision-making, especially in hierarchical structures and institutions that demand obedience to norms and protocols?

Reflection on Ethics

Question icon

Question

Difficulty Easy

Source:

Is external icon

UEAP

Freedom and Subjectivity

Community img

Join a community of teachers directly on WhatsApp

Connect with other teachers, receive and share materials, tips, training, and much more!

Teachy logo

We reinvent teachers' lives with artificial intelligence

Instagram LogoLinkedIn LogoTwitter LogoYoutube Logo
BR flagUS flagES flagIN flagID flagPH flagVN flagID flagID flag
FR flagMY flagur flagja flagko flagde flagbn flagID flagID flagID flag

2023 - All rights reserved

Terms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookies Notice