dificulta o desenvolvimento de tecnologias capazes de produzir armas químicas, biológicas e atômicas.

cria uma polarização política diferente entre a europa e os eua, baseada em seus antagonismos.

elimina os conflitos políticos e econômicos que ameaçavam a hegemonia dos eua.

possibilita o desenvolvimento industrial da rússia, já que a queda do comunismo libera capitais.

favorece a emergência de novas nações, levando à eclosão de conflitos étnicos e religiosos.

In a large number of countries and regions around the world, the 60s were characterized by the development of new forms of political expression and new social movements. The protagonists of these movements were diverse, but they had a common and initially surprising trait for many: they came from social groups different from those populating the worker, socialist, or communist movements of the 'Old Left'. They also had very different interests and demands from previous revolutionary movements. Whether they were young Germans fighting against aspects of their country's fascist past, French students in revolt against authoritarian aspects of French universities, or young Americans opposed to the Vietnam War, these people had a vision of total social transformation, but very different from the one centered on seizing state power or appropriating the means of production by the industrial proletariat, through the action of political parties acting on behalf of others. It could be the 'last great utopia', as many claim, but they stood out for a vision of transformation that, instead of subjugating the individual to the collectivity (as brutally happened in countries under Stalinist regime), started from the transformation of the individual and everyday social relations to dream and establish new forms of anti-hierarchical and anti-bureaucratic collective organization.

History

The 60s were marked by social and political movements seeking social and political transformations, but in a different way from previous workers and socialist movements. These movements, such as the French students, young Germans, and Americans opposed to the Vietnam War, had different interests and demands and did not focus on seizing state power or appropriating the means of production. They sought individual transformations and transformations in everyday social relations, dreaming of new forms of anti-hierarchical and anti-bureaucratic collective organization. This vision of social transformation was not related to the development of technologies capable of producing chemical, biological, and atomic weapons, nor to the political polarization between Europe and the USA, nor to the emergence of new nations and ethnic and religious conflicts, nor to the industrial development of Russia after the fall of communism, nor to the elimination of political and economic conflicts threatening the USA's hegemony. Therefore, the correct alternative is 'dificulta o desenvolvimento de tecnologias capazes de produzir armas químicas, biológicas e atômicas'.

Question about Cold War: Peaceful Coexistence, Conflicts and Social Movements

Subject History

History

Source UFAM

UFAM

Topic Cold War: Peaceful Coexistence, Conflicts and Social Movements

Cold War: Peaceful Coexistence, Conflicts and Social Movements

Difficulty Medium

Medium

(UFAM 2019) - Question Medium of History